Egoism is the philosophy which advocates placing yourself as your own primary value, as
opposed to concepts such as morality, virtue, justice, fairness, truth, duty,
piety, patriotism, etc… These may be used by the egoist as tools for the advancement of his self-interest, but the realization
of these ideal concepts would never be placed above his self-interest.
Contrary to popular belief, this does not mean that the
egoist always chooses to advance his own physical pleasure and well-being above
all else. Humans have the capacity, hardwired into most of us by evolution, to
develop sympathetic bonds with other humans (or with members of other species).
With such a bond, the egoist can derive psychic pleasure from the perceived
happiness of those to whom he is attached, or psychic pain from their perceived
unhappiness. In this fashion, the advancement of the well-being of certain
others becomes part of the pursuit of the egoist’s self-interest. Unlike
altruistic philosophies though, egoism does not say that it is virtuous to develop such sympathetic bonds with others. Rather, it says that
if such bonds already exist, or if developing new ones would make one happier, that
taking them into due consideration when making decisions would be wise.
The egoist can also seek pleasure in the setting and achievement
of goals, in a sense of ‘progress’ or ‘purpose’, or in the leaving of a legacy.
It’s just a matter of motivation and framing that distinguishes him from the
non-egoist. The egoist leaves a legacy because the thought of doing so gives
him pleasure; the non-egoist believes that they were put on this earth in order to leave a legacy. For the
former, the legacy is a means to the end of advancing his self-interest; for
the latter, the self is a means to the end of leaving the legacy. Am I the main thing, or is the concept (virtue, truth, legacy,
etc…) the main thing? This is the key point that distinguishes the egoist from
the non-egoist.
When stated in general terms like this, the difference may
seem subtle and inconsequential. However, it can have very real and noticeable
effects on a person’s thought process and actions: something that I try to
bring out in my fictional work.
So, that is what egoism is: but why would one bother talking
about, or advocating for, such a philosophy? Why not just keep quiet and use it
silently our own advantage? Every proponent of egoism will have their own
reasons; but I will tell you mine.
One reason is because I value individuality highly. Anything
that distinguishes a person from the herd, anything that stems from their
chaotic uniqueness, I delight in. As such, I take pleasure in speaking out
against anything that seeks to compromise people’s individuality, including
organized religion, the totalitarian State, and universalistic morality. The
first two, however, are fairly well-covered already. It is easy to find
atheistic and libertarian material, criticizing these two respectively. It is
much more challenging to find voices who challenge the concept of morality:
amoralist voices, egoist voices. This is the gap that I wish to fill.
Another reason is because I suspect that politics would
become a lot saner if egoism were more widespread throughout society. If more
people stuck to voting based on their own interests, rather than on fuzzy ideas
about ‘the general good’ or ‘the just society’ or other such nonsense, the
average political intelligence would most likely go up. It is more difficult
for propagandists to delude people about what their own interests are, than it
is to delude them about what ‘the interests of society’ are (mainly because
‘society’ has no interests). Also, if
everyone openly acted in an egoistic manner, the shysters who are currently
acting egoistically, but who manage to persuade others that they are acting
altruistically (as happens routinely in political life), would lose their
special advantage.
Finally, I just enjoy writing about this stuff. And if I can
have an audience; even better! As Max Stirner put it: “I sing because – I am a
singer. But I use you for it because
I – need ears.”
No comments:
Post a Comment